Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Suresh K...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Suresh K. Jajoo

High Court 22 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Suresh K. Jajoo
Date of order
22 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
2004-05, 2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Suresh K. Jajoo, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in quashing the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax passed u/s.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.821 OF 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax-4.v. ..Appellant. Suresh K. Jajoo...Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant. Mr. Madhur Agarwala i/by Mint & Conferer for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2013 PC: This appeal by the revenue for assessment year 2004-05 raises the following question of law for our consideration. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in quashing the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act,1961? 2)The impugned order of the Tribunal follows its own order for assessment year 2002-03 where proceedings under Section 263 of the Act have been quashed on the basis that the Assessing officer has merely followed the view of the Tribunal. ASN 3)It is agreed between the parties that the issue raised in this appeal stands covered in respondent-assessee's own case in Income Tax Appeal No.2561 of 2010 which was dismissed on 13/8/2012. 4)In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan