Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.miranda Distributors Private Limited

High Court 22 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.miranda Distributors Private Limited
Date of order
22 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.miranda Distributors Private Limited, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.558 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Miranda Distributors Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 P.C. : 1.Not on board. Mentioned. 2.Similar questions raised by the Revenue in the assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal No.3415 of 2010 has been dismissed by this Court today i.e. 22[nd] October 2012. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan