In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai v. M/S.varroc Engineering Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6927 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Varroc Engineering Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 1[st] July, 2011.
1.Counsel for the parties state that the questions of law raised in
this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in
the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v/s. Mahalaxmi Glass Works (P)
Limited reported in (2009) 318 ITR 116 (Bom).
2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue