Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Essar Steels Ltd
High Court
07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Essar Steels Ltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Essar Steels Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.In these appeals, the question raised by the revenue is whether ITAT was justified in cancelling the order of rectification passed under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Decision: Accordingly all these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1 ITXA No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2755 OF 2010,INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2759 OF 2010 &INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3401 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax-5
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Essar Steels Ltd
..Respondent.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble, for the Appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Sr.Counsel, with Mr A.K.Jasani, for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.In these appeals, the question raised by the revenue is whether ITAT was justified in cancelling the order of rectification passed under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2.The finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal is that unless the investment allowance in assessment year 1989-90 was first withdrawn under section 32A(5) read with section 154 (4A) of the Income tax Act,1961, the consequential action under section 154 could not be taken. Admittedly, no steps have been taken to withdraw the investment allowance in assessment year 1989-90. In this view of the matter, no fault can be found in the order. Accordingly all these appeals are dismissed.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
2 ITXA No.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.