In Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. Piramyd Retail & Merchandising Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: PC 1A short question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the expenditure incurred by the Assessee was a revenue expenditure.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4122 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax -5Vs.Piramyd Retail & Merchandising Pvt. Ltd.,
)..Appellant
)..Respondents
----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 10/1/2011.
PC
1A short question raised in this appeal is whether the Tribunal
was justified in holding that the expenditure incurred by the Assessee was a revenue expenditure. The Tribunal in paragraph-3 of its Judgment has recorded a finding of fact that the expenditure incurred by the assessee in opening its 3[rd] mega store at Nagpur was for expansion of its existing business. The Tribunal has
recorded a finding of fact that the details of expenditure furnished by the assessee clearly established that the expenditure was a revenue expenditure. The decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact. No question of law arises out of order of the Tribunal. Appeal is dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.