Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5Mumbai v. M/...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5Mumbai v. M/S. Trust House Commercecentre (P) Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5Mumbai v. M/S. Trust House Commercecentre (P) Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5Mumbai v. M/S. Trust House Commercecentre (P) Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1841 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income-Tax-5Mumbai...Appellant. Vs. M/s. Trust House CommerceCentre (P) Ltd., ..Respondent. Ms. Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 6TH JULY, 2011. P.C. Not on Board. Taken up by consent of the parties. 2.In view of the fact that the Special leave petition No. 20075-20076/2010 filed by the revenue against the decision of this Court (dismissing similar appeal fined by the revenue) in the assessee’s own case has been dismissed by the Apex Court vide its order dated 07/01/2011, Counsel for the revenue seeks to withdraw the present appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. 3.Refund of court fee as per law. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan