Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S.magnasound (India) Limited
High Court
01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S.magnasound (India) Limited
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai v. M/S.magnasound (India) Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3719 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax - 6, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Magnasound (India) Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.S.A. Bhagwat for Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 1[st] July, 2011.
1.In the present case, the Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for A.Y. 1998-99. Though it is contended by the Revenue that the order of CIT (A) for AY 1998-99 has been quashed and remanded to the file of CIT (A) for fresh decision, the fact remains that consistently in the past the claim of the assessee has been allowed. In any event, the AO is bound to pass order on the basis of the order of CIT (A), which is holding the field.
2.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.