In Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Ruby Mills Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SSM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2373 OF 2010
ININ INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4192 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax-7VERSUS
.... Appellant
M/s. Ruby Mills Ltd.
.... Respondent
Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.
Mr. Balasaheb Yewale i/by Rajesh Shah and Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM:J. P. DEVDHAR and MRIDULA BHATKAR J.J.DATED:JANUARY 25, 2011.
P.C.:
By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)
(J. P. DEVDHAR, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue