Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 v. M/S.rapt...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 v. M/S.raptakos Brett & Co.ltd

High Court 04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 v. M/S.raptakos Brett & Co.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3657 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1619 OF 2005 Commissioner of Income-tax-7 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Raptakos Brett & Co.Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Uma G.Wagle for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 257 days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support indicates that the matter was sent to the law department for drafting appeal on 25.3.2005. The draft was received from the law ministry on 18.11.2005. A period of more than 7 months for drafting the appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. Hence, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1619 OF 2005 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.