Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Pembril Engineering Pvt.ltd
High Court
02 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Pembril Engineering Pvt.ltd
Date of order
02 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Pembril Engineering Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: However, the saidorder categorically states that the Appellant isdirected to remove office objections, if any, within aperiod of six weeks from the date of order, failingwhich the Appeal will stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1690 OF 2005Commissioner of Income Tax-7Vs.
..Appellant
Pembril Engineering Pvt.Ltd...Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for the Mr.A.Vissanji with Mr.J.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
the Appellant.CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 2ND JULY, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Byour order dated 29th January,2008, the delay in filingthe above Appeal was condoned. However, the saidorder categorically states that the Appellant isdirected to remove office objections, if any, within aperiod of six weeks from the date of order, failingwhich the Appeal will stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the Court.
2.We find that after a lapse of almost six
months till today, the office objections are notremoved by the Appellant. In view thereof, pursuantto the aforesaid order dated 29th January,2008, theAppeal stands dismissed.
(A.V.NIRGUDE,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue