Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Profin Money Markets Ltd
High Court
16 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Profin Money Markets Ltd
Date of order
16 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Profin Money Markets Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is consequently dismissed along with all the pending applications.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 584/2016, CM APPL.29578-29579/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Cousnel.
versus
PROFIN MONEY MARKETS LTD.
Through: None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
%
O R D E R16.08.2016
The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) for AY 1997-98 in ITA No.2364/Del/2001. The impugned order is dated 09.09.2005. The appeal is facially inordinately time barred - i.e., by ten years. On this ground alone it is not maintainable as no sufficient cause has been shown for the filing of the appeal in a delayed fashion. That apart, the Court notices that the ITAT’s order concurred with the order of the CIT (A) which had cancelled/set aside the Assessing Officer’s order adding the amount of `92,06,800/- by applying Section 68. The common reasoning of the CIT (A) and the ITAT was that the allotment of shares by way of public issue was closely regulated by statutory authorities such as SEBI and in the
circumstances the question of applying Section 68 did not arise.
We find no infirmity with the order even on the merits.
The appeal is consequently dismissed along with all the pending applications.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
AUGUST 16, 2016 /vikas/
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.