Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Golden Tobacco Ltd
High Court
09 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Golden Tobacco Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai 400 020 v. M/S Golden Tobacco Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly both the Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2326 OF 2013WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2328 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-8,Mumbai 400 020 v/sM/s Golden Tobacco Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
Mr Arvind Pinto for Appellant. Mr Jitendra Jain with Mr Sameer Dalal for Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C.:-
1.Both these Appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 challenge the common order dated 26[th] June 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Years 1998-99 and 2007-08.
2.Mr Pinto, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the tax involved in both the Appeals for the two
ITXA2326.13
Assessment Years 1998-99 and 2007-089 is less than prescribed threshold limit of Rs.20 lakhs as provided in Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th ]December 2015 which direct the Revenue not to challenge the orders of the Tribunal by way of appeal to this Court. Further, the Circular No.21 of 2015 also states where the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs in each of the Appeals arising out of composite orders passed by the Tribunal, then such Appeals to this Court would be withdrawn.
3.Mr Pinto states that the tax effect involved is Rs.2.98 lakhs for AY 2007-08 and Rs.18.80 lakhs for AY 1998-99. Therefore, he seeks to withdraw these Appeals.
4.Accordingly both the Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
5.Refund of court fees as per rules.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.