In Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. M/S. Rachana Udyog (Exports) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 391 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4252 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax-8...Appellant.Vs.
M/s. Rachana Udyog (Exports) Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.Heard learned Counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent though served.
2.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue