Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. Paranjap...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. Paranjape Griha Nirman Pvt.ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. Paranjape Griha Nirman Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 v. Paranjape Griha Nirman Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.446 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax-8....Appellant vs.Paranjape Griha Nirman Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.--- Mr.Sureshkumar, for appellant.Mr.Murlidharan i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co., forRespondent. DATED: 4[th] September,2008. P.C.:- 1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. The decision of the tribunal turns onrecording of finding of facts. No question of lawarises. Hence, the appeal is rejected. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan