Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. Deshmukh...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. Deshmukh Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd

High Court 02 Jul 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. Deshmukh Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd
Date of order
02 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-9 v. Deshmukh Builders & Developers Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1099 OF 2006 Commissioner of Income-Tax-9,...Appellant. Vs. Deshmukh Builders & Developers Pvt.Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. July 2, 2010. P.C. : On the appeal being restored to file, it has been taken on board by consent and with the consent of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, has been called out for hearing. The Tribunal has furnished adequate reasons in paragraph 6 of its impugned decision for sustaining the deletion made by the Commissioner of Appeals. A pure finding of fact has been recorded by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has observed that the assessee has shown profits on year to year basis as a percentage of the sales revenue generated. The assessee has shown eight percent profits on the entire amount received which was referable to a specific flat or house. This was not disputed by the Assessing Officer, who had accepted the method followed by the assessee. The Tribunal has observed that this was a plain factual matter. The Tribunal also observed that there was no material whatsoever to suggest that the advances made were in the nature of sales revenues. This being a pure finding of fact, no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan