In Commissioner Of Income Tax-9Appellantmumbai v. M/S Assyst India Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Under these circumstances,there is no substantial question of law involved.Appeal stands dismissed. { A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J } { A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1307 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax-9AppellantMumbai
Vs.
M/s Assyst India Pvt.Ltd.. Respondent
Mr.R.Asokan for AppellantMs.V.B.Patel for Respondent
P.C.
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATE : 14th July, 2008
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.Perused the order of the tribunal dt. 19.4.2005.The order in para 12 categorically records thatthe Assessing Authority is directed to give aneffective opportunity to the assessee company topresent its case with particulars and details andaccordingly the matter is remanded back for adenovo consideration. Under these circumstances,there is no substantial question of law involved.Appeal stands dismissed.
{ A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
{ A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue