Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shr...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Mahendra Singh Asoliya, H

High Court 23 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Mahendra Singh Asoliya, H
Date of order
23 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ajmer v. Shri Mahendra Singh Asoliya, H, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: 2.While admitting the appeal, this Court framed following substantial question of law :- "Whether in the facts & circumstances of the case, the ITATwas justified in treating the proceedings initiated u/S.147r/w Sec.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as ab-initio void?" 3.In our considered opinion, the...

Decision: 5.Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 206 / 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax, Ajmer. ----Appellant Versus Shri Mahendra Singh Asoliya, H.No. 162, Dhosar, Teh. Sahada, Bhilwara. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr.KK Bissa. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Anjay Kothari. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Judgment / Order 23/01/2018 1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal hasallowed the appeal of the assessee relying upon the decision ofthis Court. 2.While admitting the appeal, this Court framed following substantial question of law :- "Whether in the facts & circumstances of the case, the ITATwas justified in treating the proceedings initiated u/S.147r/w Sec.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as ab-initio void?" 3.In our considered opinion, the Tribunal while considering the matter has rightly relied upon the decision of this Court in (2008)306 ITR 343 (Raj.) (Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shri RamSingh). The addition which was made was beyond the scope ofSection 147 r/w Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the view taken by the Tribunal is required to be affirmed. 4.In that view of the matter, the issue is answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. 5.Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed. (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J. (K. S. JHAVERI)J. S.Phophaliya/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan