Commissioner Of Income Tax Ajmer v. Urban Improvement Trust Civil Lines, Todarmal Lane, Ajmer
High Court
07 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ajmer v. Urban Improvement Trust Civil Lines, Todarmal Lane, Ajmer
Date of order
07 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Ajmer v. Urban Improvement Trust Civil Lines, Todarmal Lane, Ajmer, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Review No. 166 / 2017
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ajmer
----Petitioner
Versus
Urban Improvement Trust Civil Lines, Todarmal Lane, Ajmer
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 456 / 2017 The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ajmer
----Non Applicant/Appellant
Versus
M/S Urban Improvement Trust Civil Lines, Todarmal Lane, Ajmer
---Applicant/Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Daksh Pareek for Mr. Sameer JainFor Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Gargeiya
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
07/02/2018
For the reasons mentioned in the review application, thesame is allowed. The order dated 25/7/2017 is recalled.
The main matter be listed on 28[th] February, 2018.
In Misc. Appl. No. 456/2017
For the reasons mentioned in the misc. application, the same
is allowed.
In the order dated 25/7/2017 in DBITA No. 392/2011, nameof Mr. Mahendra Gargeiya be read as counsel for the respondent.
(INDERJEET SINGH)J.
(K.S.JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/3-4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue