Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur

High Court 17 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

17 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar v. M/S Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 5 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Misc. Restoration Application No. 87/2017 In D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 762/2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar ----Appellant Versus M/s Singhal Industries, A-103, Brij Industrial Area, Bharatpur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Parinitoo Jain. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHAOrder 17/10/2019 There is delay of 1699 days in filing of the restorationapplication. Application No. 417/2017 under Section 5 of theLimitation Act has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filingof the restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the sameis allowed. Delay in filing of the restoration application iscondoned. This restoration application has been filed seekingrestoration of D. B. Income Tax Appeal No. 762/2008. For the reasons mentioned in the restorationapplication, the same is allowed. D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.762/2008 is restored to its original number for being listed beforethis Court today itself. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J MANOJ NARWANI /85

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.