Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S.dhruv

High Court 13 Aug 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S.dhruv
Date of order
13 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
1991-1992
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. M/S.dhruv, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed. od/-JUDGE NM* od/-JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THR 13 DAY OF AUGUST, 2012 PRESENT THER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEBEDHAR ANT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR 1.T.A. No.955 OF 2007 BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,C.R. Building, Queen’s Road, Bangalore. ooThe Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-5(1),Circle-5(1), C.R. Building, Queens Road, Bangalore. (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) Appellants AND: Dr. Syed Anwar, No. 11 Church Street,Basavanagudi,Bangalore. (By Sri A. Shankar & Sri M. Lava, Advocates) Respondent This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUT|OT|orderdated10.08.2007passed1n IT(SS)A23/BANG/2005 for the Assessment Year 1991-1992 to2001-2002, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleasedto (i) formulate the substantial questions of law statedtherein and (ii) allow the appeal and set-aside the orderpassed by the ITAT, Bangalore in IT(SS)23/Bang/2009 dated10.08.2007|confirmingtheorderottheAppellateCommissioner and confirm the order passed by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Circleo(1), Bangalore, in theinterest of justice and equity. This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following: JU DBGMENT In view of the decision of this Court in the case otThe Commissioner of Income Tax and another Vs. M/s.Dhruv and Co.in ITA No.938/2006 decided on 10.08.2011, thequestion of law is answered in favour of revenue. The matteris remitted to the Assessing Officer for passing theconsequential order as per the observations in para 4 of thecited case. The appeal is allowed. od/-JUDGE NM* od/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan