In Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr v. Umesh Prasad Singh, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal being similar, this appeal is also dismissed in terms of order dated 13.8.2012 passed in Misc.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.436 of 2008
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr Versus Umesh Prasad Singh
.... .... Appellant/s
.... .... Respondent/s with
======================================================
Miscellaneous Appeal No.445 of 2008
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr Versus Umesh Prasad Singh
.... .... Appellant/s
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In MA No.436 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : Mr. S.K.Sharan Mr. Archana Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. (In MA No.445 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : Mr. S.K.Sharan For the Respondent/s : Mr.
Mr. Archana Sinha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and leaned
12. 25.09.2012
counsel for the assessee.
From the submissions it is evident that the issues raised in this appeal arising from a common judgment are same as were raised in batch of miscellaneous appeals bearing No. 425 of 2008 (Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Patna and Anr. Vs. Umesh Prasad Singh and other analogous appeals which were heard and dismissed by a reasoned order passed by us on 13.08.2012.
The questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal being similar, this appeal is also dismissed in terms of order dated 13.8.2012 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 425 of 2008
and other analogous appeals.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
Fahad./-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.