Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax - Applicant(S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax - Applicant(S v. Bipin Dayal Sinojia - Respondent(S

High Court 04 Aug 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax - Applicant(S v. Bipin Dayal Sinojia - Respondent(S
Date of order
04 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax - Applicant(S v. Bipin Dayal Sinojia - Respondent(S, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITR/301/1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 301 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH =========================================================1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ?1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ? 2To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]?? ========================================================= COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Applicant(s) Versus BIPIN DAYAL SINOJIA - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR MANISH R BHATTfor Applicant(s) : 1,SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent(s) : 1,========================================================= CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 04/08/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG) ITR/301/1995 2/2JUDGMENT Todayitself, wehavedisposedofIncomeTaxReferenceNo. 300 of 1995, deciding the question referredto us, against the interests of the Revenue. Income TaxReference No. 300 of 1995 was in relation to one of thepartners of M s/ . Jayant Extraction Industries. Present is alsoa Reference against another partner of M s Jayant Extraction/ . Industries. The question referred to us and the facts of thematters are identical. In view of our Judgment in IncomeTaxReferenceNo. 300of1995, we decidethe questionagainsttheinterestsoftheRevenue. TheReferenceisdisposed of accordingly. No costs. [ . . R S Garg J, .] . rmr [ M R Shah J. . , . ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan