Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Environmental Planning & Coordination Org
High Court
07 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Environmental Planning & Coordination Org
Date of order
07 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Environmental Planning & Coordination Org, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal Vs. Environmental Planning & Coordination Org
07.10.2014.
Shri Sanjay Lal for the appellant
This is revenue’s appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act calling in question tenability of the order-dated 20.2.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A. No. 18/Ind/2006.
Assessment proceedings for the year 2002-03 was completed against the assessee under section 143(3) and a total income of `4,37,25,520/- was assessed. The assessee is a Society registered by the Government of Madhya Pradesh for promoting environmental studies. During the course of assessment, the Assessing Officer found that Auditors Report in the prescribed form No.10-B was not enclosed alongwith the return. Accordingly, the benefit of exemption was denied, the assessment was completed and assessment order passed.
However, when the matter was called in question by the assessee in appeal before the Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal, the delay in filing the Auditor’s Report was condoned and exercising its power under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, the appellate authorities have concurrently held that mere delay in submission of the Auditor’s Report cannot be a ground for denying the benefit of exemption, when there was no discrepancy in the Auditor’s Report; there was no concealment of income or any error pointed out by the Assessing Officer in the matter of submission of the return by the Organization.
Finding the respondents to have bonafide reasons for the delay in filing the Auditor’s Report, the Auditor’s Report has been accepted and certain modifications made to the assessment order.
In doing so, we are of the concerned view that the discretion exercised by the appellate authorities and the reasons given for extending the benefit of section 11 of the Income Tax Act, no error has been committed and no substantial question of law in the matter arises for consideration, warranting interference.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
(RAJENDRA MENON) (SANJAY YADAV) J U D G E J U D G E
Aks/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.