Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Northern Province Of Carmelite Sister Of Teresa

High Court 16 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Northern Province Of Carmelite Sister Of Teresa
Date of order
16 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Bhopal v. M/S Northern Province Of Carmelite Sister Of Teresa, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Issue: Thequestion of law proposed in this appeal reads as under : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding thefindings of Id.

Decision: With the aforesaid, this appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
I.T.A.No.24/2014 Commissioner of Income Tax Bhopal Vs. M/s Northern Province of Carmelite Sister of Teresa 16/01/2015 Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the IncomeTax Act has been filed calling in question the tenability of an orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 29.7.2013. Thequestion of law proposed in this appeal reads as under : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding thefindings of Id. CIT (A) directing the A.O. to allow set off ofcarry forward deficit of A.Y.2003-04 of Rs.92,15,262/-against current year's income and allowing the balancedeficit to be carry forward for being applied in subsequentyear ?” It is common ground that the aforesaid question of law hasalready been decided against the revenue by a coordinate benchof this Court at Indore in the case of Commissioner of IncomeTax Vs.Shri Gujrati Samaj 2012 (17) Taxman.com 164(Madhya Pradesh). Keeping in view the aforesaid question of law alreadydecided in the case of Shri Gujrati Samaj (supra), we see noreason to make any further indulgence into the matter. With the aforesaid, this appeal stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) Judge (Rajendra Mahajan) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan