Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Gharsana(D.b.income Tax Appeal
High Court
26 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Gharsana(D.b.income Tax Appeal
Date of order
26 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Gharsana(D.b.income Tax Appeal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER VS. KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, GHARSANA(D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.161/14)
Dated:-26[th] April, 2016.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHAHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Mr.H.G.Chanda for Mr.K.K.Bissa, for the appellant.
-'BY THE COURT : (PER HONBLE MR.SANGEET LODHA,J.)
1.This appeal is directed against order dated 25.2.14 of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur,whereby the appeal preferred by the Revenue, questioning thelegality of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT (A)], deleting the additions made by theAssessing Officer while rejecting the claim of the assessee forexemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961( for short “the Act”), stands dismissed.
2.The controversy involved in the present appeal standscovered by decision of this court rendered today in D.B.IncomeTax Appeal No.47/13 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Bikaner vs.Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raisinghnagar) & other connected
appeals, whereby the decision of the ITAT in identical mattersallowing the claim of the assessee for exemption under Section11(1)(a) of the Act, has been upheld and accordingly, theappeals have been dismissed.
3.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra).
(DEEPAK MAHESHWARI), J.
(SANGEET LODHA),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.