Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
High Court
18 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
Date of order
18 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.42/2013
Commissioner of Income Tax, BikanerVs.Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
DATE OF ORDER :: 18.2.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the appellant
...
This appeal is preferred to question correctness of thejudgment dated 18.12.2012 passed by learned Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur.
The argument advanced by learned counsel for the appellantis two-fold :- (1) that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred whileremanding the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to examine case of assessee in light of exemptionavailable as per Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and(2) that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred while setting offexcess expenditure in income of earlier years.
We have examined the judgment impugned.
So far as the first issue is concerned, it is relevant to notethat the assessee claimed exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 but the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) examined the same in light of provisions of Section 11(2)of the Act of 1961. The Tribunal remanded the matter with a
direction to adjudicate the entire matter afresh by taking intoconsideration provisions of Section 11(1)(a) of the Act of 1961.In our considered opinion the remand made by the Tribunal is inaccordance with law. The other issue with regard to setting off ofexcess expenditure in income of earlier years is concerned, we areof the opinion that the finding arrived is based upon the judgmentof this Court. It is not in dispute that the assessee is creation of astatute and from inception that is a charitable institution. It is alsopertinent to notice that subsequent to the year 2009 the exemptionas allowed by ITAT is available to the assessee. In view of it, we donot find any just reason to interfere in the instant matter beinghaving no subsequent question of law involved. The appeal isdismissed accordingly.
[P.K. LOHRA], J. , J.
Sanjay
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.