Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Bikaner v. Kr...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Bikaner v. Krishi Upajsamiti, Rawla(D. B. Income Tax Appeal

High Court 04 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Bikaner v. Krishi Upajsamiti, Rawla(D. B. Income Tax Appeal
Date of order
04 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Bikaner v. Krishi Upajsamiti, Rawla(D. B. Income Tax Appeal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 5.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Commissioner of Income Tax-Bikaner Vs. Krishi UpajSamiti, Rawla(D. B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.149/2014) Date of Order : 4.5.16 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the appellant. 1.The requirement of production of certified copy of theimpugned order is dispensed with. 2.Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 3.This appeal is directed against order dated 25.2.14 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur,whereby the appeal preferred by the Revenue, questioning thelegality of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT (A)], deleting the additions made by theAssessing Officer while rejecting the claim of the assessee forexemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961( for short “the Act”), stands dismissed. 4.The controversy involved in the present appeal standscovered by decision of this court rendered on 26.4.16 inD.B.Income Tax Appeal No.47/13 (Commissioner of Income Tax,Bikaner vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raisinghnagar) & otherconnected appeals, whereby the decision of the ITAT in identicalmatters allowing the claim of the assessee for exemption underSection 11(1)(a) of the Act, has been upheld and accordingly,the appeals have been dismissed. 5.In this view of the matter, this appeal is also dismissed inlight of decision of this court in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Raisinghnagar's case (supra). (KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA), J. (SANGEET LODHA), J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan