Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Commissioner Of Income Tax Business Circ...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Business Circle X,Chennai – 600 006 v. M/S. Bafna Chandra Sirish & Brosold

High Court 21 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Business Circle X,Chennai – 600 006 v. M/S. Bafna Chandra Sirish & Brosold
Date of order
21 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Business Circle X,Chennai – 600 006 v. M/S. Bafna Chandra Sirish & Brosold, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.1.2016CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal Nos.55 and 169 of 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax Business Circle X,Chennai – 600 006... Appellant in TC.A.Nos.55 and 169 of 2011 Vs. M/s. Bafna Chandra Sirish & BrosOld No.6, New No.11Mulla LaneSowcarpetChennai-79...Respondent in T.C.55/11 M/s Bafna Naresh Girish & Bros,Old No.6, New No.11,Mulla Lane, Sowcarpet,Chennai – 600 079... Respondent in TC.A.No.169 of 2011 Prayer in TCA No.169 of 2011: Appeal presented to the High Courtunder Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act 1961 against the orderof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras `A' Bench, dated12.12.2008, in I.T.A.No.185/Mds/2008. and against the order dated 12.10.07 and made in Appeal No.(ITCA) IV/CHE/505 & 506/2006-07 respectively on the file of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IV, Chennai and against theorder dated 22.12.2006 and 21.12.2006 and made inPAN/GIR.NO.AAGFB0120J and AAGFB0119H respectively on the file ofJoint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range X, Chennai-6. Prayer in TCA No.55 of 2011: Appeal presented to the High Courtunder Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act 1961 against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras `A' Bench,dated 12.12.2008, in I.T.A.No.184/Mds/2008. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ against the order dated 12.10.07 and made in Appeal No.(ITCA)IV/CHE/505 & 506/2006-07 respectively on the file of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IV, Chennai and against theorder dated 22.12.2006 and 21.12.2006 and made inPAN/GIR.NO.AAGFB0120J and AAGFB0119H respectively on the file ofJoint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range X, Chennai-6. COMMON JUDGMENT The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeals, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matters is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-. 2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeals, if it is found that they had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though they fall under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular. 3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeals, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeals, if it is foundthat they had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though theyfall under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of theCircular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. usk/adlhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To: 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `A' Bench, Chennai 2. The Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) IVChennai 3. The Joint Commissioner of Income TaxRange X, Chennai-6 2 ccs to Mr.S. Sridhar, Advocate, Sr. 3456, 3457 Tax Case Appeal Nos.55 and 169 of 2011 VD (CO)kk 8/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan