Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-I v. Shri...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-I v. Shri Suresh Nanda

High Court 22 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

22 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (C)-I v. Shri Suresh Nanda, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 7. + ITA 29/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (C)-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zohed Hossain, Junior Standing Counsel for Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel. versus SHRI SURESH NANDA ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 22.01.2016 CM No. 835 of 2016 (for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The application is allowed. ITA No. 29 of 2016 3. Learned counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issues urged in this appeal by the Revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2004-05 are answered against it by the order dated 27[th] May 2015 passed by this Court in ITA No.715 of 2014 (Commissioner of Income Tax(C)-1 v. Suresh Nanda), which was common to AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09. 4. In that view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 22, 2016 mg VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.