Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gu...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Marigold Merchandise (P) Ltd., New Delhi

High Court 14 Oct 2015 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

14 Oct 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Marigold Merchandise (P) Ltd., New Delhi, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 229 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2015 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon ....Appellant. Versus M/s Marigold Merchandise (P) Ltd., New Delhi ...Respondent. 1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN. PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate and Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1.Delay of 213 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. 2.For orders, see ITA No. 182 of 2015 (Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. M/s Marigold Merchandise (P) Ltd., New Delhi). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE October 14, 2015gbs (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.