Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gu...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, M/S Hill View Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Chandigarh

High Court 13 Aug 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

13 Aug 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, M/S Hill View Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Chandigarh, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 220 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.8.2015 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon ....Appellant. Versus Principal Officer, M/s Hill View Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Chandigarh ...Respondent. CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN. PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate and Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1.Delay of 53 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. 2.For orders, see ITA No. 206 of 2015 [Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, M/s Hill ViewInfrastructure (P) Ltd., Chandigarh]. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE August 13, 2015gbs (RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.