Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.safmarine India Private Limited
High Court
14 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.safmarine India Private Limited
Date of order
14 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.safmarine India Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2094 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Safmarine India Private Limited
..Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.
Mr.Niraj Seth with Mr.Rajesh Poojary i/by Mint & Confreres for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard Learned Counsel for the revenue. The issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of assessee itself in Income Tax Appeal No.1311 of 2008 decided on 28-1-2009, which arose out of block assessment for the period from 1-4-1995 to 4-9-2001. The finding of the CIT (A) relied upon by the revenue have been set aside by the tribunal and the appeal preferred therefrom has already been dismissed by this Court.
2.Under these circumstances, no substantial question of law can be said to arise from the order of the tribunal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.