Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Sudhakar M. Shetty
High Court
11 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Sudhakar M. Shetty
Date of order
11 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. Shri Sudhakar M. Shetty, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4 lakhs all these 4 appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3409 OF 2010WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3403 OF 2010WTIH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3407 OF 2010WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3437 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai ...Appellant.Vs.Shri Sudhakar M. Shetty..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Anamika Malhotra for the Appellant.
Ms. Usha Dalal for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.
Counsel for the parties state, the disputed tax in all these appeals together does not exceed to Rs.1,83,004/-. Hence, in view of the Board Circular, the tax effect being less than Rs. 4 lakhs all these 4 appeals are dismissed.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue