Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I v. M/S.gtl Ltd
High Court
19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I v. M/S.gtl Ltd
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I v. M/S.gtl Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and it is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 450 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I
… Appellant
v/s
M/s.GTL Ltd.
… Respondent
Mr.Charanjeet Chanderpal for the appellant.Mr.Rahul Hakani for the respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2014
P. C. :
1Heard Mr.Chanderpal, appearing on behalf of the appellant.
2We have perused the submissions. We are of the opinion that the findings which have been recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are in consonance with the judgment of this Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & anr., reported in (2010) 328 ITR
81 (Bom.). In the circumstances, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and it is accordingly dismissed.
3The advocate for the respondent assessee undertakes to file his Vakalatnama within one week from today.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue