Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. Heard. Registry Is Directed To Register All These Appeals. Office
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. Heard. Registry Is Directed To Register All These Appeals. Office
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. Heard. Registry Is Directed To Register All These Appeals. Office, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1908 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1909 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1910 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1911 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1912 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1913 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1914 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2076 OF 2008ANDWEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2077 OF 2008ANDWEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2078 OF 2008ANDWEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2079 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central II, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Smt.Jyoti H. Mehta
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
objections, if any in these appeals are over-ruled. By consent of parties, all these appeals are taken up for hearing.
2.Both parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the two judgments of this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.675 of 2008 CIT V/s. M/s.Growmore Research & Asset Management Limited, Mumbai decided on 10-2-2009 and by another order passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1890 OF 2008, CIT V/s. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta decided on 5-3-2009.
3.In this view of the matter, we see no substantial questions of law arising in all these appeals. All the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue