In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. S.j. Mulchandani, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: In the circumstances, we allow this motion in - 2 - terms of prayer (a).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 560 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2002
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II .. Appellant
V/s
S.J. Mulchandani .. Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
None present for the Respondent.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2005
P.C.
P.C. :
1. The Appeal was rejected on 8th January 2002 by
the Prothonotary & Senior Master for not removing the
office objections. Now we find that all the objections
are removed. Motion is taken out for setting aside the
order of the Prothonotary & Senior Master and to restore
the Appeal to the file. It was taken out immediately
after the order was passed.
2. In the circumstances, we allow this motion in
- 2 -
terms of prayer (a). Appeal will stand restored to the
file and be listed for admission on 12th December 2005.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.