Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. S.j. Mulchandani

High Court 29 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. S.j. Mulchandani
Date of order
29 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii v. S.j. Mulchandani, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: In the circumstances, we allow this motion in - 2 - terms of prayer (a).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 560 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II .. Appellant V/s S.J. Mulchandani .. Respondent Mr. A.S. Rao for the Appellant. None present for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2005 P.C. P.C. : 1. The Appeal was rejected on 8th January 2002 by the Prothonotary & Senior Master for not removing the office objections. Now we find that all the objections are removed. Motion is taken out for setting aside the order of the Prothonotary & Senior Master and to restore the Appeal to the file. It was taken out immediately after the order was passed. 2. In the circumstances, we allow this motion in - 2 - terms of prayer (a). Appeal will stand restored to the file and be listed for admission on 12th December 2005. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan