In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - Ii v. Swiss Glass Coat Equipment Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1437 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 145 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 147 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1529 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1559 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1611 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1838 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1956 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2243 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2244 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2250 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2273 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2414 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2417 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2421 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2575 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 286 of 2017With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 418 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 485 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 539 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 566 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 569 of 2011
C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER
With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 594 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 596 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 597 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 603 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 604 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 61 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 623 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 666 of 2015With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 736 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 786 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 787 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 78 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 972 of 2017
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - IIVersusSWISS GLASS COAT EQUIPMENT LTD
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 05/09/2018
COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Mrs.Mauna Bhatt, under
C/TAXAP/1437/2010 ORDER
instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
ANKIT SHAH
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.