Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi v. M/S. J.s. Electronics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi v. M/S. J.s. Electronics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, New Delhi v. M/S. J.s. Electronics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.The appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI
+ ITA No. 46 of 2006
Judgment reserved on: August 06, 2007
%Judgment delivered on: September 21, 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi....Appellant
Through Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Advocate
Versus
M/s. J.S. Electronics Pvt. Ltd.44, Friends Colony,New Delhi.
...Respondent
Through Mr. Ajay Vohra with Mrs. KavitaJha, Advocates
Coram:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
Not necessary
3. Whether the judgment should be reported Not necessary
in the Digest?
ITA No. 46/2006
MADAN B. LOKUR, J.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 12th May,
2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench “F”, New Delhi in ITA No. 1994 (Del) of 1999.
2.
The appeal arises out of penalty proceedings. In the quantum
appeal (ITA No.1315/2006), we have come to the conclusion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration. Since the present appeal is consequential, we are of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises.
3.The appeal is dismissed.
Madan B. Lokur, J
September 21, 2007ncg
S. Muralidhar, J
Certified that the corrected copy of the judgment has been transmitted in the main Server.
ITA No. 46/2006
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.