In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.national Steel & Agro Industries Limited, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.7.50 lakhs which was added by the assessing officer on the basis of the papers given by ex-employee of the assessee namely Ms.Ashwini Rane (Pawar) is the question raised in this appeal...
Decision: 3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4732 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.National Steel & Agro Industries Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Ms.Beena Pillai with Mr.Satish Chandra for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] October 2012
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.7.50 lakhs which was added by the assessing officer on the basis of the papers given by ex-employee of the assessee namely Ms.Ashwini Rane (Pawar) is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in para 9.3.1 of its decision has recorded a finding that the assessing officer himself was not convinced about the papers submitted by the ex-employee of the assessee and no credibility can be attached to said vague papers. In these circumstances, the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal being based on finding of fact, we see no reason to entertain the appeal.
3.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.