Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Iv, Room v. Triumph Securities Ltd., Radha Bhuvan, 1[St] Floor
High Court
07 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Iv, Room v. Triumph Securities Ltd., Radha Bhuvan, 1[St] Floor
Date of order
07 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Iv, Room v. Triumph Securities Ltd., Radha Bhuvan, 1[St] Floor, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.09.0820:04:00+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2375 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-IV,Room No. 663, 6[th] Floor,Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road,Mumbai-400 020 Vs.Triumph Securities Ltd.,Radha Bhuvan, 1[st] Floor,121, Nagindas Master Road,Fort, Mumbai 400 023.PAN : AAACT 2152P
.. Appellant
.... Respondent
********
Mr.Arvind Pinto for appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 7[th] SEPTEMBER 2022
PC :
1.Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the tax effectin the present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms ofCircular No.17 of 2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdrawthe present Appeal.
2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposedof as involving low tax effect.
3. However, we observe that in case, the Revenue fnds forsome reason that the Appeal was not supposed to have beenwithdrawn in the light of the Circular, dated 8[th] August 2019, itwould be open to the Revenue to fle an application/praecipeseeking restoration of the Appeal, to be decided on its own merits.Refund of Court-fees as per Rules.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.