Commissioner Of Income Tax } Central – Iv } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
High Court
19 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax } Central – Iv } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
Date of order
19 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax } Central – Iv } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Tribunal's order dated 24[th] February, 2012 is upheld.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1340 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax}Central – IV}AppellantversusM/s. H. N. Tradelinks Pvt. Ltd.}Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Vishnu Hadade for the Respondent.
CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED :-NOVEMBER 19, 2014
P.C. :-
In the case of this very Assessee, identical order of the Tribunal was challenged in Income Tax Appeal No. 1518 of 2012. The same questions, as are formulated at page 7 of the paper book of this Appeal, were raised in that Appeal. By our order dated 14[th] November, 2014, the Revenue's Appeal has been dismissed by us, as it did not raise any substantial question of law. Nothing different or distinguishable has pointed out. In such circumstances, this Appeal, for the assessment year 2006-07 is also dismissed. The Tribunal's order dated 24[th] February, 2012 is upheld.
(A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue