Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central Iv v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central Iv v. M/S. Nitco Tiles Ltd

High Court 28 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central Iv v. M/S. Nitco Tiles Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

PNP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.791 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.156 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.415 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax- Central IVversusM/s. Nitco Tiles Ltd. ..Petitioner. ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Arvind D. Pinto with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Review Petitioner.Ms. Beena Pillai, i/b Mr. Niraj Punamiya for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDJ. P. DEVADHAR, JJ. 28 February 2013. P.C. : There is a delay of 66 days in filing the Review Petition. The delay has been satisfactorily explained and hence the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.