Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Iv v. M/S.goodwill Properties Pvt Ltd
High Court
07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Iv v. M/S.goodwill Properties Pvt Ltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Iv v. M/S.goodwill Properties Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the ITAT remanding the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer to consider as to whether the payment made to the assessee was compensatory or by way of regularization charges or for infraction of the provisions of law.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
T
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3179 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-IV
Vs.
M/s.Goodwill Properties Pvt Ltd
..Appellant
.. Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant.
Mr J.D.Mistri , Sr.Counsel with Aasifa Khan, for Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 07[th] July,2011.
P.C.
1. Heard.
2. This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the ITAT remanding the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer to consider as to whether the payment made to the assessee was compensatory or by way of regularization charges or for infraction of the provisions of law. Since the matter is remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer, we are not entertaining the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer to consider as to whether the payment made to the assessee was compensatory or by way of regularization charges or for infraction of the provisions of law. Since the matter is remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer, we are not entertaining the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue