Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaip...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Sushil Godawat

High Court 08 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

08 Dec 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur v. Shri Sushil Godawat, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.18/2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Shri Sushil Godawat C/o Chetna Medicals, Hospital Road,Udaipur. ----Respondent __________________________________________ For Appellant : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent : Mr. Bhagirath Patel for Mr. Anjay Kothari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARIOrder 08/12/2016 In the instant appeal, the tax effect does not exceedthe monetary limit of Rs.20 lacs and therefore, in view ofthe Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by theMinistry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Boardof Direct Taxes, Government of India, New Delhi, learnedcounsel for the Revenue wants to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (DEEPAK MAHESHWARI)J. (SANGEET LODHA)J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.