Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Luaniana v. Resspondents
High Court
11 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Luaniana v. Resspondents
Date of order
11 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Luaniana v. Resspondents, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT |CHANDIGARH
TLTA-234-2012 ©(O&M)
Date of decision:- 11.08.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Luaniana
.. Appellant
Versus
Smt. Satisn Bala Malhotra and otners
...ReSspondents
CORAM* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDARoCHIEF JUSTICEHON‘ BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBA
Present:- Mr. Rajyesn Katoch, Advocate,
Tor tne appellant. |
Mr. Panka] Jain, Senior Advocate, |with Mr. Sacnin Bhardwaj, Advocate,Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate,and Mr. Gaurav Mittal, Aavocate,
Tor the respondents. —xe KK
S.J. VAZIFDAR7C.J.
It 1s agreed that the result in this appeal follows the result in ITA-232-2012 titled as.Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Luaniana VsSmt. Satisn Bala Malhotra and otherswhich was dismissed by our separate order and judgement passedtoday.
2.For the reasons stated in ITA-232-2012, this appealis also dismissed on the ground that it does not raise a.supstantialL question of law ana that the findings of theTribunal are not perverse.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(DEEPAK SIBAL)JUDGE |
11.08.2016 Anodh|
Wnetner s(eakin7/reasonedYes/NoWhether re(ortableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue