Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Chavan Rishi International (P) Ltd., New Delhi
High Court
16 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Chavan Rishi International (P) Ltd., New Delhi
Date of order
16 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Chavan Rishi International (P) Ltd., New Delhi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No. 63 of 2011 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No. 63 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.10.2019
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana
.......Appellant
Vs.
M/s Chavan Rishi International (P) Ltd., New Delhi
......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILLHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counselfor the appellant.Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counselfor the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Suri, Advocatefor the respondent.
*****
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
CM-3510-CII-2011
This is an application for condonation of delay of 416 days in
re-filing the present appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.Delay of 416 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
ITA-63-2011 (O&M)
1.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the
tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with Letter No. F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he has
ITA No. 63 of 2011 (O&M)
instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3.Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) October 16, 2019 JUDGE GurpreetWhether speaking /reasoned : YesWhether Reportable : No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.