Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Freeman Measures (P) Ltd., Ludhiana
High Court
23 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Freeman Measures (P) Ltd., Ludhiana
Date of order
23 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Freeman Measures (P) Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA502001
Sr. No. 407
Decided on : 23.08.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana
..... Appellant
VERSUS
M/s Freeman Measures (P) Ltd., Ludhiana ..... Respondent
CORAMHON4BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON4BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Zora Singh Klar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with
Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.
>>>>>>>
S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is Rs.1,20,500/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, issuedby the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted tothe revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives therein.
2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
| S.J. VAZIFDAR |CHIEF JUSTICE
23.08.2016
shamsher
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
*
*
Yes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.