Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Janta Estate & Housing Development Ltd., Mohali
High Court
11 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Janta Estate & Housing Development Ltd., Mohali
Date of order
11 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Janta Estate & Housing Development Ltd., Mohali, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CM No. 25076 of 2018 in/and TTA-80-2011(O&M)Date of decision:- 11.17.7018
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana
.. Appellant
Versus
M/s Janta Estate & Housing Development Ltd., Mohali
.. Respondent
CORAM'' HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARTCHIEF JUSTICEHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALL
Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate,for the appellant.Mr. R.S.Kalra, Advocate, for the respondent. |
x K K Xx
KRISHNA MURARLTC.J.(ORAL)
CM No. 250760 of 2018 1S allowed as prayed for.
Main case 1s taken on record.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that|since the tax effect involved 1s“a23,41 384/-,sche has instructions towithdraw the present appeal in view of Circular No. 03/2018, dated|11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.However, she has prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to.file an application for revival of the appeal in case something|survives therein. ~
DoDismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It 1s,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue|shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is beingleft open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.
(KRISHNA MURARTI)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLI) —
JUDGE|
11L.12.2018Amodh
Whether 3*eaking/reasoned|Whether re*ortable
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.