Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Ludhiana v. Satish Kumar Mittal, J.(Oral
High Court
04 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Ludhiana v. Satish Kumar Mittal, J.(Oral
Date of order
04 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Ludhiana v. Satish Kumar Mittal, J.(Oral, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 859 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-04.02.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Ludhiana.
Versus
..... Appellant
Smt. Ved Kumari Mittal
.... Respondent
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present:-Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the appellant.
Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate andMr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocatefor the respondent.
2222
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions fromthe Department, states that in view of Circular No.21/2015 issued bythe Government of India Vide letter dated 10.12.2015, the appellantdepartment does not want to pursue this appeal.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
04.02.2016 |( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)T@eINJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue