Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pa...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna v. M/S. Jevar Jewellers

High Court 01 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

01 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna v. M/S. Jevar Jewellers, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHIC.M.P. No. 451 of 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna... PetitionerVersus M/s. Jevar Jewellers ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Roshan, AdvocateFor the Respondent : ------ Dated 1st July, 2013 Order No. 04 I.A. No. 1868 of 2012 Heard learned counsel for the appellant on application for condonation of delay. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing this C.M.P. is condoned. I.A. No. 1868 of 2012 is allowed. C.M.P. No. 451 of 2011 In view of the reasons stated in Tax Appeal No. 33 of 2008 which too, was dismissed without notice to other parties and which has been restored by order passed in C.M.P. No. 441 of 2011, having same facts in this C.M.P., this C.M.P. Is allowed and T.A. No. 53 of 2006 is restored to its original number. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.